Critique of Population Health Intervention Assignment
Purpose
Population-level interventions include strategies aimed at the promotion of health and prevention of disease that target a specific group of people. Population-focused interventions can be designed to reach at-risk populations, reducing health risks and disparities. However, population-focused interventions may also be effective in reaching geographic populations. The purpose of this assignment is to identify and critique an existing population health intervention within a selected community. The impact of the intervention will be discussed, and a recommendation for enhancement will be proposed. Critique of Population Health Intervention Assignment
Course Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will address the following course learning outcomes.
- CO 2: Investigate initiatives and regulations to promote population health and their related ethical and legal considerations (PO 4, 5)
- CO 4: Articulate advanced nursing practice roles and competencies to support population health (PO 3, 4)
- CO 6: Examine evidence-based practice and trends impacting the future of population health nursing. (PO 5)
ORDER HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Suggested Due Date
This assignment has a suggested due date of Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Module 5.
The final due date is Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Module 7.
Total Points Possible: 150 Points
Assignment Overview
Consider the population-focused interventions that are present within a selected community. Identify one specific population health intervention and investigate that intervention to determine accessibility, levels of prevention, and social determinants of health that are addressed. Identify one gap that is present and propose one recommendation to enhance population health outcomes.
In a 2-4 page paper, address the elements listed below. Include a minimum of 3 scholarly sources, current within 5 years, to support your work. See the rubric for specific, required content criteria within each section of the paper.
- Provide an introduction to the paper.
- Present a succinct synopsis of the population health intervention that was selected, and the specific population health risks and disparities that are addressed through that intervention.
- Describe the accessibility, levels of prevention, and social determinants of health that are addressed through the identified strategy.
- Consider one gap that is present and include one recommendation for change to enhance health outcomes.
- Provide a conclusion to the paper. Critique of Population Health Intervention Assignment
Assignment Instructions
- Sources older than 5 years may not be used.
- Title page, pagination, subheadings, body of paper, citation of sources, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the most current edition of the manual.
- Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure are followed and consistent with formal, scholarly writing as noted in the most current edition of the APA Manual.
- No more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) may be used in this assignment.
- First person may not be used in the assignment.
- Please note: If you do not receive a proficient rating in any major content category, you can re-submit your assignment with revisions in those content categories to receive a better grade. You have one additional opportunity to revise after the initial submission in order to make improvements. The initial submission must be a complete paper; rough drafts will not be graded. All revisions must be submitted no later than Sunday of Week 7 at 11:59 p.m. MT (You cannot revise your graduate-level writing style for a higher grade in that category.). Critique of Population Health Intervention Assignment
Assignment Criteria
Assessment Criteria | Points | % | Description |
Introduction | 21 | 14% | This section includes the following.
· General statements regarding the importance of population-focused interventions · Identification of one population health intervention to be critiqued · Identification of the sections of the paper · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented Critique of Population Health Intervention Assignment
|
Overview of Population Health Intervention | 30 | 20% | This section includes the following.
· Succinct synopsis of one population health intervention within the community · Discussion regarding the specific population health risks and/or disparities addressed through the intervention |
Critique of Selected Population Health Intervention | 33 | 22% | This section includes the following.
· Appraisal of the accessibility of the intervention to the population served · Appraisal of the levels of prevention addressed through the intervention · Appraisal of the social determinants of health that are addressed through the intervention · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Recommendation for Enhancement | 30 | 20% | This section includes the following.
· Recommendation for one enhancement to improve population health outcomes · Rationale for the recommended enhancement · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Conclusion | 21 | 14% | Conclusion includes the following.
· Concluding statements regarding the importance of population health interventions · Implications for advanced nursing practice to support population health outcomes |
Graduate-level Writing Style | 15 | 10%
|
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure
· Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing Critique of Population Health Intervention Assignment · Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person · Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) · Correct APA format for the following. o Page numbering o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) |
Quality of Literature Support | It is an expectation that a minimum of 3 scholarly sources, current within 5 years, are integrated within the assignment.
If the above expectation is not met, 3 points shall be deducted.
|
||
Assignment Length Criteria | It is an expectation that the paper is a minimum of 2 pages in length, and a maximum of 4 pages (not including the title or reference pages).
If the above expectation is not met, 3 points shall be deducted.
|
||
Total | 150 | 100% | A quality assignment will meet or exceed the above requirements. |
ORDER NOW
Grading Rubric
Assessment Criteria | Distinguished
(100%)
|
Exceeds
(92%)
|
Proficient
(84%)
|
Needs Improvement
(0%)
|
Introduction | 21 Points | 19 Points | 17 Points | 0 Points |
Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner:
· General statements regarding the importance of population-focused interventions · Identification of one population health intervention to be critiqued · Identification of the sections of the paper · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:
· General statements regarding the importance of population-focused interventions · Identification of one population health intervention to be critiqued · Identification of the sections of the paper · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:
· General statements regarding the importance of population-focused interventions · Identification of one population health intervention to be critiqued · Identification of the sections of the paper · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:
· General statements regarding the importance of population-focused interventions · Identification of one population health intervention to be critiqued · Identification of the sections of the paper · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
|
Overview of Population Health Intervention | 30 Points | 27 Points | 25 Points | 0 Points |
Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner:
· Succinct synopsis of one population health intervention within the community Critique of Population Health Intervention Assignment · Discussion regarding the specific population health risks and/or disparities addressed through the intervention |
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:
· Succinct synopsis of one population health intervention within the community · Discussion regarding the specific population health risks and/or disparities addressed through the intervention
|
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:
· Succinct synopsis of one population health intervention within the community · Discussion regarding the specific population health risks and/or disparities addressed through the intervention |
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:
· Succinct synopsis of one population health intervention within the community · Discussion regarding the specific population health risks and/or disparities addressed through the intervention |
|
Critique of Population Health Intervention | 33 Points | 30 Points | 27 Points | 0 Points |
Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner:
· Appraisal of the accessibility of the intervention to the population served · Appraisal of the levels of prevention addressed through the intervention · Appraisal of the social determinants of health that are addressed through the intervention · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:
· Appraisal of the accessibility of the intervention to the population served · Appraisal of the levels of prevention addressed through the intervention · Appraisal of the social determinants of health that are addressed through the intervention Critique of Population Health Intervention Assignment · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:
· Appraisal of the accessibility of the intervention to the population served · Appraisal of the levels of prevention addressed through the intervention · Appraisal of the social determinants of health that are addressed through the intervention · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:
· Appraisal of the accessibility of the intervention to the population served · Appraisal of the levels of prevention addressed through the intervention · Appraisal of the social determinants of health that are addressed through the intervention · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
|
Recommendation for Enhancement | 30 Points | 27 Points | 25 Points | 0 Points |
Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner:
· Recommendation for one enhancement to improve population health outcomes · Rationale for the recommended enhancement · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:
· Recommendation for one enhancement to improve population health outcomes · Rationale for the recommended enhancement · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:
· Recommendation for one enhancement to improve population health outcomes · Rationale for the recommended enhancement · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:
· Recommendation for one enhancement to improve population health outcomes · Rationale for the recommended enhancement · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
|
|
Conclusion | 21 Points | 19 Points | 17 Points | 0 Points |
Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner:
· Concluding statements regarding the importance of population health interventions · Implications for advanced nursing practice to support population health outcomes |
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:
· Concluding statements regarding the importance of population health interventions · Implications for advanced nursing practice to support population health outcomes
|
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:
· Concluding statements regarding the importance of population health interventions · Implications for advanced nursing practice to support population health outcomes |
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:
· Concluding statements regarding the importance of population health interventions · Implications for advanced nursing practice to support population health outcomes |
|
Graduate-level Writing Style | 15 Points | 13 Points | 12 Points | 0 Points |
Distinguished graduate-level writing style is evidenced by meeting all of the following criteria with 0-1 errors total:
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure · Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing · Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person · Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) · Correct APA format for the following. o Page numbering o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
|
Graduate-level writing style exceeds expectations as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 2-4 errors total:
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure · Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing · Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person · Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) · Correct APA format for the following. o Page numbering o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
|
Proficient graduate-level writing style is evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 5-7 errors total:
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure · Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing · Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person · Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) · Correct APA format for the following. o Page numbering o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
|
Graduate-level writing style needs improvement as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 8 or more errors total:
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure · Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing · Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person · Synthesis of information is present with no more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) · Correct APA format for the following. o Page numbering o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
|
|
Quality of Literature Support | 0 Points Deducted | 3 Points Deducted | ||
A minimum of three peer-reviewed scholarly sources, current within 5 years, are integrated within the assignment. | The assignment fails to meet the requirement noted for quality of literature support. | |||
Assignment Length Expectations | 0 Points Deducted | 3 Points Deducted | ||
The length of the assignment meets the criteria:
Minimum of 2 pages in length; maximum of 4 pages in length (not including title or reference pages). Critique of Population Health Intervention Assignment |
The assignment fails to meet the requirement for length. |