As a DNP-prepared nurse, it is imperative to explore the connection between research and quality improvement. How might a practice-focused question result in positive changes to the field of practice?

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

As a DNP-prepared nurse, it is imperative to explore the connection between research and quality improvement. How might a practice-focused question result in positive changes to the field of practice? How might the use of various methods lend itself to capturing substantive results for improvement?

In this Assignment, you will explore both quantitative and qualitative methods in a critique of a published DNP project. You will consider how the findings connect to a practice-focused question.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare:

Select a DNP project that uses both quantitative and qualitative methods to summarize the results from the options provided.
Review the required Learning Resources regarding how to summarize results.
Consider how the findings reflect the practice-focused question in the selected project.

The Assignment

Critique a DNP project that used both quantitative and qualitative methods and summarize the results.

Link the results of both quantitative and qualitative findings to the practice-focused question in the DNP project.

Your Assignment should total no more than 5-7 pages, plus your title page and reference page.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 10

Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 10.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK10Assgn_LastName_FirstInitial
Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_8211_Week10_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8211_Week10_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritiqued the results of the quantitative methods used in the selected DNP project.	68 to >58.0 ptsExcellentThe response comprehensively and clearly describes the patient care delivery gap or problem. The response comprehensively and clearly includes metrics and data for support. 58 to >48.0 ptsGoodThe response clearly describes the patient care delivery gap or problem. The response clearly includes metrics and data for support. 48 to >38.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes the patient care delivery gap or problem. The response inaccurately or vaguely includes metrics and data for support. 38 to >0 ptsPoorThe response vaguely or inaccurately describes the patient care delivery gap or problem, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague metrics and data, or it is missing.	68 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarized results of the qualitative methods used in a selected DNP project.	68 to >58.0 ptsExcellentThe response comprehensively and clearly describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the identification. 58 to >48.0 ptsGoodThe response clearly describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the identification. 48 to >38.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the identification. 38 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes the gap or problem by addressing the type of indicators, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the identification, or it is missing.	68 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentified the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused questions in the DNP project.	34 to >29.0 ptsExcellentThe response comprehensively and clearly identifies the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused question/s in the scholarly project. 29 to >27.0 ptsGoodThe response includes examples that support the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused question/s in the scholarly project. 27 to >26.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely identifies the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused question/s in the scholarly project. 26 to >0 ptsPoorThe response does not describe the connection between the results of the findings and the practice-focused question/s in the scholarly project.	34 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.	10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. 8 to >7.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. 7 to >6.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. 6 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.	10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation	10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 8 to >7.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 7 to >6.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 6 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.	10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.	10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors. 8 to >7.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. 7 to >6.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. 6 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.	10 pts

Total Points: 200

Academic Writer & Editor

You May Also Find Helpful

To critically examine the historical, social, and economic aspects of labor and employment relations, and to investigate how emerging technologies and policy proposals

CLC Case 3 This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment. The purpose of this assignment is to analyze a company's future financial health.

As the Director of an early childhood education program that includes a very diverse community of families, you understand the importance of developing meaningful connections