Assignment: Argument Blueprint Mapping By the end of this assignment, you will have a comprehensive argument map that both details your argument for the Week 9 debate and integrates your research from last week

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
– Background & Importance (10 points)

10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentProvides a
thorough, clear background (at least 4 sentences) and detailed explanation of
importance (at least 3 sentences). Fully contextualizes the issue and
prepares the reader for the argument.

9 to >7.0 ptsProficientBackground and
importance included and mostly clear; may be missing 1–2 required sentences
total (e.g., 5–6 total sentences instead of 7). May have minor gaps in
detail.

7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactoryBackground or
importance present but vague, incomplete, or significantly under length (4–5
total sentences).

5 to >3.0 ptsDevelopingBackground
and/or importance minimal, unclear, or brief (3 or fewer total sentences).

3 to >0 ptsMissingNo background or
importance provided.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePosition
Statement (10 points)

10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentComplete,
concise, and well-formed Although+Claim+Because statement; clearly reflects
research; uses no "I"; directly states stance.

9 to >7.0 ptsProficientPosition
statement mostly correct, minor clarity or format issues; reflects research.

7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactoryStatement
present but vague, missing part of the formula, or not fully grounded in
research.

5 to >3.0 ptsDevelopingStatement
unclear, incomplete, or does not follow formula.

3 to >0 ptsMissingNo position
statement provided.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTwo
Supporting Arguments – Evidence & Reasoning (20 points)

20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentIncludes two
fully developed arguments. Each argument has 1 sentence for the main point
and at least 3 sentences of evidence (minimum 4 total per argument).
Reasoning is clear, logical, and well-supported by research.

18 to >15.0 ptsProficientTwo arguments
present, but one may fall short of sentence minimum (e.g., 2 sentences of
evidence). Reasoning mostly clear; minor depth issues.

15 to >11.0 ptsSatisfactoryOne or both
arguments underdeveloped or missing evidence (e.g., only 1–2 total sentences
per argument).

11 to >6.0 ptsDevelopingArguments
minimal or unclear; most sections fail to meet sentence requirements.

6 to >0 ptsMissingNo complete
arguments or evidence provided

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeObjections
and Refutation (15 points)

15 to >14.0 ptsExcellentAddresses
objections in full with strong reasoning and evidence. Includes at least 3
sentences for the objection, 3 sentences of supporting evidence, and 3
sentences of refutation (9 total). Logical and persuasive refutation connects
back to main argument.

14 to >11.0 ptsProficientObjection,
evidence, and refutation present but one part may fall slightly short (e.g.,
2 sentences instead of 3 in one section). Mostly clear and supported.

11 to >8.0 ptsSatisfactoryAll three
sections included but 2 or more fall short of sentence minimums or reasoning
is vague.

8 to >4.0 ptsDevelopingObjection or
refutation minimal or unclear; fails to meet most sentence expectations.

4 to >0 ptsMissingNo objection or
refutation included.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion –
Summary, Compromise/Solution, and Call to Action (10 points)

10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentConclusion
includes all three required components: summary (at least 3 sentences),
compromise/solution (at least 2 sentences), and call to action (at least 2
sentences). Persuasive and logically connected to the argument.

9 to >7.0 ptsProficientAll elements
included but one area may be slightly under length (e.g., 1 sentence short)
or lacks minor detail.

7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactoryConclusion
present but missing one of the three parts or under length in multiple
sections.

5 to >3.0 ptsDevelopingConclusion
minimal or unclear; fails to meet sentence expectations for most elements.

3 to >0 ptsMissingNo conclusion
provided.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of
Research & Completeness (10 points)

10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentIntegrates
research from Findings Log thoroughly across sections; all sections complete,
showing a comprehensive blueprint.

9 to >7.0 ptsProficientResearch
included in most sections; most sections complete.

7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactorySome use of
research; several sections incomplete or partially developed.

5 to >3.0 ptsDevelopingMinimal
evidence of research; most sections incomplete.

3 to >0 ptsMissingNo evidence of
research; blueprint incomplete.

10 pts