In epidemiology, meta-analyses are becoming a common research design. They are also “the most frequently cited form of clinical research,” and as such are an important type of study for the advanced practice nurse to be familiar with (Haidich, 2010).
For this Assignment, you will analyze a meta-analysis article and consider the implications of this research design for nursing practice, building on this week’s Discussion.
Reference: Haidich, A. B. (2010). Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia, 14 (Suppl. 1), 29–37. https://www.hippokratia.gr/images/PDF/14Sup1/699.pdf
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
To prepare:
· Using the Walden Library, locate a peer-reviewed article that utilizes a meta-analysis design and examines a population health topic that interests you. Your article must be a meta-analysis specifically, not just a systematic review.
The Assignment:
In 2–3 pages, not including title page and references, address the following:
· Identify your selected article. Explain what characteristics make this a meta-analysis.
· Were the inclusion and exclusion criteria clearly stated? How were the articles that were included selected? Do you agree with the researchers’ approach? Explain why or why not.
· Do you agree with the conclusions? Explain why or why not.
· Explain how you could apply implications from the study to your nursing practice.
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 2–3 pages, not including title page and references, address the following:Identify your selected article. Explain what characteristics make this a meta-analysis.
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe article is clearly identified. The response accurately, clearly, and concisely explains the characteristics that make it a meta-analysis.
Were the inclusion and exclusion criteria clearly stated? How were the articles that were included selected? Do you agree with the researchers’ approach? Explain why or why not.
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response provides an accurate, clear, and concise explanation of whether the inclusion and exclusion criteria were clearly stated and how included articles were selected. A critique of the researcher’s approach with strong rationale is included.
Do you agree with the conclusions? Explain why or why not.
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentA clear and concise critique of the study’s conclusions that demonstrates strong critical thinking is provided.
Explain how you could apply implications from the study to your nursing practice.
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentAn accurate and detailed explanation of how the study could be applied to nursing practice is provided.
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Written Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Written Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.
The post In epidemiology, meta-analyses are becoming a common research design first appeared on Ehomeworker.